Original Articles

Analysis of Functional Movement Screen Scores According to Playing Positions in Elite Junior Female Volleyball Players

Volume 16 Publish Date: September 9, 2026
Full Text PDF
DOI
Gökhan Tuna ORCID
Department of Coaching Education, Trakya University Kırkpınar Faculty of Sport Sciences, Edirne, Türkiye
Tuna, G. (2026). Analysis of Functional Movement Screen Scores According to Playing Positions in Elite Junior Female Volleyball Players. Research in Sports Science, 16, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5152/rss.2026.26034
Full Text Full-Text PDF

Abstract

Volleyball imposes substantial neuromuscular and biomechanical demands that vary by playing position, yet position-specific differences in movement quality remain underexplored. This cross-sectional study examined Functional Movement Screen scores in elite female volleyball players by playing position and interpreted findings in terms of movement quality, stability–mobility balance, and injury risk. Sixty-two elite junior (adolescent) female players (mean age 14.7 ± 1.5 years; libero n = 9; middle blocker n = 11; setter n = 14; opposite hitter n = 3; outside hitter n = 25) competing in top-tier national leagues participated voluntarily. The seven-subtest Functional Movement Screen was administered by a single Functional Movement Screen–certified evaluator under standardized conditions. Two missing subtest cells were imputed using a K-Nearest-Neighbors procedure (k = 5). Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, Shapiro–Wilk normality tests, one-way analysis of variance, analysis of covariance controlling for age and body mass index, Mann–Whitney U pairwise comparisons with Hedges’ g effect sizes, chi-square tests, and Pearson correlations. Total Functional Movement Screen scores did not differ significantly across positions (F(4, 57) = 1.59, p = .19, η² = .10), but the moderate effect size and large pairwise contrasts (opposite vs. outside hedges’ g = −1.33) suggested potentially meaningful position differences. Outside hitters exhibited the highest mean (13.68 ± 1.75), and opposite hitters the lowest (11.33 ± 1.16). Using the Functional Movement Screen ≤ 14 threshold, 79.0% of athletes were classified as at-risk, peaking among opposite hitters (100%) and middle blockers (90.9%). Anthropometric correlations were weak (r ≤ .12). The findings support integrating position-tailored, movement-quality-based corrective training into volleyball performance and injury-prevention programs.  

Cite this article as: Tuna, G. (2026). Analysis of functional movement screen scores according to playing positions in elite junior female volleyball players. Research in Sports Science, 16, 0034, doi: 10.5152/rss.2026.26034.

 

 

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Research in Sports Science
Volume / Issue Volume 16
Pages 1-8
History
Published Online September 9, 2026
Affiliations
Gökhan Tuna ORCID
Department of Coaching Education, Trakya University Kırkpınar Faculty of Sport Sciences, Edirne, Türkiye
Cite this Article
Tuna, G. (2026). Analysis of Functional Movement Screen Scores According to Playing Positions in Elite Junior Female Volleyball Players. Research in Sports Science, 16, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5152/rss.2026.26034
Outlines